Temp Sumz Revda delivered one of the most commanding performances of their early-season campaign, dismantling Sibirtelekom-Lokomotiv 105-77 in a Basketball Super League 1 fixture played on 1 October 2026. The hosts crossed the century mark with room to spare, controlling the game from the opening quarter and never allowing the visitors from Novosibirsk a realistic route back into the contest.

The 28-point margin tells the story of a night defined by Revda's offensive efficiency and defensive pressure. By the time the final buzzer sounded, the home bench was emptying, the tempo had long since been dictated, and the result had moved firmly into the "statement win" category for a team with ambitions near the top of the Super League 1 table.

Match Overview

The game was decided early. Revda opened with an aggressive, up-tempo approach, pushing the ball in transition and attacking the rim before Sibirtelekom-Lokomotiv's half-court defence could set. That early rhythm produced a double-digit lead inside the first ten minutes, and the visitors spent the rest of the evening chasing a deficit that only grew.

• Final score: Temp Sumz Revda 105 – 77 Sibirtelekom-Lokomotiv
• Date: 1 October 2026
• Competition: Basketball Super League 1
• Winner: Temp Sumz Revda (home)
• Margin: 28 points

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

Revda set the tone immediately and never let the intensity drop, outscoring their opponents in all four periods.

• Q1: Revda 28 – 19 Sibirtelekom-Lokomotiv
• Q2: Revda 25 – 18 Sibirtelekom-Lokomotiv
• Q3: Revda 26 – 21 Sibirtelekom-Lokomotiv
• Q4: Revda 26 – 19 Sibirtelekom-Lokomotiv

The consistency is striking: Revda scored at least 25 points in every quarter, a level of sustained output that reflects both shot quality and the depth of the rotation. There was no lull, no third-quarter wobble, and no period in which the visitors were able to string together enough stops to threaten a comeback.

Key Moments

The decisive stretch arrived late in the first quarter. With the game still reasonably tight, Revda closed the period on a run built on defensive stops and quick outlet passes, turning a narrow advantage into a nine-point cushion. That sequence forced Sibirtelekom-Lokomotiv into a more hurried offensive approach, and the resulting contested shots only fed Revda's transition game.

Early in the third quarter, the visitors briefly found some rhythm from the perimeter and trimmed the gap, but Revda answered almost immediately with a 9-0 burst that pushed the lead past twenty. From that point the contest was effectively settled, and the final period became an opportunity for the home coaching staff to rotate the bench and manage minutes ahead of a busy stretch of fixtures.

Tactical Story

Revda's game plan was clear and executed almost perfectly. On offence, they prioritised early shot-clock opportunities, attacking before the defence could load up, and they punished every defensive rebound with a fast break. Their ball movement forced Sibirtelekom-Lokomotiv into repeated rotations, and the extra pass consistently found the open shooter.

Defensively, the hosts switched aggressively on screens and crowded the paint, daring the visitors to beat them from the outside. That gamble paid off. Sibirtelekom-Lokomotiv managed just 77 points and struggled to generate clean looks in the half court, frequently settling for contested jumpers late in possessions. Their rebounding, too, was a problem: second-chance points were scarce, and Revda's control of the defensive glass removed one of the few routes back into the game.

Standout Performances

Revda's scoring was spread across the roster, which is arguably the most encouraging aspect of the performance. The backcourt dictated tempo and created open shots, while the frontcourt finished efficiently around the rim and held its ground on the boards. A balanced attack of that kind is difficult to defend, and it allowed the coaching staff to keep legs fresh without any drop in production.

For Sibirtelekom-Lokomotiv, there were isolated positives — a few well-executed half-court sets and some determined individual drives — but too little of it came consistently. Guards were forced into difficult decisions, and the interior scoring that the team relies on was largely neutralised.

Season Impact

A 105-77 victory carries real weight in the Basketball Super League 1 standings. Beyond the win itself, the margin matters in a competition where points differential can shape seeding and tiebreakers later in the season. Revda banked a valuable head-to-head