Football>INT CF
Follow the match
INT CF
Quevilly Rouen Métropole - Mtropole VS Boulogne Live Score
Quevilly Rouen Métropole
07-11 23:00
1 - 1
End
Boulogne - Mtropole VS Boulogne Live Score
Boulogne
Live Match
Statistics
H2H
Quevilly Rouen Métropole
Boulogne
Attacks
--
--
Dangerous Attacks
--
--
Ball Possession
--
--
On Target
--
--
Off Target
000--
000--
Important Events
Live text broadcast
End 1-1
Halftime 0-0
Goal
Shot on target
Shot off target
Penalty
Penalty Missed
Penalty shootout
Own goal
Assist
Corner
yellow card
red card
Second yellow
Subsititution
Subsititution(injury)
VAR
Match Info

Quevilly Rouen Métropole 1–1 Boulogne | International Club Friendly

Quevilly Rouen Métropole and Boulogne played out a hard‑fought 1–1 draw in their pre‑season friendly on 11 July 2026. The encounter, staged at Quevilly’s training ground, provided both French third‑division sides with a stiff test of endurance and tactical discipline in the build‑up to the new campaign.

The first half was a tight, tactical affair with few clear‑cut chances. Quevilly edged possession but found Boulogne’s compact 4‑4‑2 difficult to break down. The deadlock was finally broken just before the interval: a quick throw‑in caught Boulogne’s defence out of shape, and Quevilly’s midfielder arrived late at the back post to volley home from close range. The goal gave the home side a narrow lead at the break.

Boulogne came out with renewed purpose in the second half. They pushed their full‑backs higher and began winning second balls in midfield. The equaliser arrived in the 67th minute: a well‑struck free‑kick from 25 yards dipped over the wall and nestled inside the post, leaving the Quevilly goalkeeper rooted to the spot. Both sides had opportunities to snatch a winner in the final quarter‑hour, but tired legs and resolute defending kept the score level.

The draw was a fair reflection of a contest in which neither side dominated for sustained periods. Quevilly will be pleased with their defensive organisation and set‑piece threat, while Boulogne showed character to fight back after falling behind.

Key tactical observations:

  • Quevilly’s 3‑5‑2 formation gave them width but left gaps that Boulogne exploited after the break.
  • Boulogne’s pressing intensity increased noticeably in the second half, forcing Quevilly into hurried clearances.

Standout players: Boulogne’s goalscoring midfielder was a driving force; Quevilly’s centre‑back made several crucial interceptions. Both goalkeepers had relatively quiet evenings but made saves when called upon.

With the pre‑season schedule now in full swing, both managers will take useful data from this 1–1 draw as they finalise their starting line‑ups for the opening day of the league season.